On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:44:08 -0800, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Perhaps we should try and move forward somehow. I've just looked > > through the mailing list and there are several other bug fixes that > > should be applied to any new build. > > In the short term, > > 1) I'd be glad to contribute my fixes to anyone that cares, that would > be willing to CVS-ize them, and make them generally available. I would be more than willing to bring the files together and serve them up on jeb.ca > 2) I'd be willing to make available my binary distribution to anyone > that wants my fixes (I've called it 0.0.668, since there were 3 fixes > applied to 0.0.665), but I'm working on 0.0.669, adding more keys to the > legal set of accelerator keys... all keys are legal accelerator keys to > Windows, and only a subset were implemented in Win32::GUI. > > 3) I'd be willing to incorporate patches into my version, if someone > identifies them, and sends me the patches, they aren't too cumbersome to > apply, and make the merged binary distribution available. > > > Then there is the documentation > > project headed up by Erick Bourgeois > > (http://jeb.ca/perl/win32-gui-docs/index.pl/home). We just need to get > > some momentum going... > > Accelerator keys could use more documentation now that I have them working. Glenn, since you have fixed the bugs and are most familar (perhaps) with the code at this point, could you do the editing? Do you mind creating an account with my documentation content manager? This way I could set your priviledge to "Content Manager" and you could make all the changes you want to accelerator keys. -- Erick
