Glenn Linderman wrote:
On approximately 5/5/2006 12:42 PM, came the following characters from the keyboard of Robert May:

I can duplicate the problem and the solution. I don't understand why the presented solution solves the problem.

As can I. I assumed (some years back when I discovered this) that Win32::API wound up being smarter, in maybe checking for pre-existance of the constants before re-exporting them?

Or maybe because the prototypes are different, the warning occurs when the stricter one is exported second?

I don't intent to spend time finding out why :-) but a quick inspection of Win32 (not Win32::API) and Win32::GUI suggest that they both use Exporter in the same way.

I guess it'll remain a mystery.

Rob.

Reply via email to