From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Rubinow, Larry wrote:
> > Finally, a legitimate case for symbolic references?
>
> I doubt it. Having names like this for subroutines sounds strange enough;
> they're not very descriptive.
Did you really want the full name of my subs? Why? Would it help you solve
the problem?
I find that when discussing private issues in public, I get the best results
if I abstract.
> And if they are realy intimately connected in a series, consider storing
> references to the sub in an array or a hash, rather than giving them such
> funny names.
They were, as it happens, but it was not necessary to post that, was it?
> That's what Perl has data structures for, to save people using $formfield1
> through $formfield15.
Really?
Now I'm wasting everyone's time too. Sorry folks.
lee
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-users
