Glenn Linderman wrote:

> While I agree with your sentiments, and terminology, I think you are 
> only historically correct.  Since the advent of "PerlIO", I think that 
> Perl _does_ do the LF to CRLF conversion on DOS... but only in emulation 
> of the preexisting C runtime IO libraries that PerlIO replaces (to get 
> better functionality for threads, for more consistency across different 
> compilers, and for better UTF-8 support, are, I think, the reasons it 
> was invented, but I may be underinformed in that area).

That's quite possible since with the unicode support you would be
forced to do binary writes to handle it and therefore would have
to duplicate whatever the text mode stuff of the underlying OS was
doing when in text mode.  So you're probably right in actuality,
but the spirit of the issue is still the same - a \n is still a
^J and not some special character marker replaced with a 'newline'
if you follow my drift.

-- 
  ,-/-  __      _  _         $Bill Luebkert    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (_/   /  )    // //       DBE Collectibles    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / ) /--<  o // //      Castle of Medieval Myth & Magic http://www.todbe.com/
-/-' /___/_<_</_</_    http://dbecoll.tripod.com/ (My Perl/Lakers stuff)
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

Reply via email to