Title: RE: Resolved - Question about Win32::OLE

After screwing up the last two days, I now have this well embedded in my mind. Welllll, at least until I have another memory dump.

This list is a great resource.

Best to all,
Sturdy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com
> Subject: RE: Resolved - Question about Win32::OLE
>
> I think that's what most of us were getting at.  In order for your "or"
> conditions to be tripped you would have to get something back that did not
> evaluate to false.  In the case of a function that is returning positive
> numbers for error codes, there is about a 99% chance that it is returning
> 0 on success.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:perl-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com
> Subject: RE: Resolved - Question about Win32::OLE
>
> Hi Nick,
> > Take a look at the API doc for whatever SFTP program you are accessing;
> > it may be returning values you are not expecting.  After you instantiate
> > via the new method in OLE you are passed back whatever the external
> > program passes back.  It could be passing back 0 upon success which will
> > cause die to work azz-backwards.
> That's a good point and may be the issue. Unfortunately, the API doc only
> provides vbs examples with little added info, no return value info, etc.
> However, I did drop an email to the company. No response yet.
> Thanks,
> Sturdy

_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
Perl-Win32-Users@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

Reply via email to