On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:35:48PM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Stanley Hopcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >In retrospect, what you say about using dSP before there is a Perl > >interpreter seems very sensible, but this does not affect an unthreaded > >Perl. > > It would if you built it with "multiplcity" enabled. > I usually build my non-threaded perl's that way to flush out > missing dTHX-es in my core-patches and XS code. because otherwise (ie without threads or multiplicity) dTHX (and friends) are all defined to empty strings, hence there's no change if you happen to omit them. Which is why you the same thing working on unthreaded, and failing spectacularly on a threaded build. Nicholas Clark
