Tassilo Von Parseval ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: > No, SvREADONLY is totally ok. The question whether a macro or function > is documented in perlapi.pod isn't usually a strong indication for > anything. perlapi is far from complete. I think many of the XS authors > have fallen into the habit of having the perl source at hand and looking > up things in there, and thus short-circuiting perlapi.
Thanks Tassilo! To bad that perlapi is not complete, but I guess I get the level of documentation that I pay for. :-) Being a very occasional XS author, I am of course a bit wary of going into the undocumented area. I'm working with my second XS module ever, and I'm leaning a lot on my first XS module, and that module was a port of another author's work. -- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
