-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Moin,
On Friday 14 October 2005 14:41, Jeremy White wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > > > Quite a difference! No idea why... > > > >Unicode would be my guess. > > Perhaps a stupid question - can 5.8.x be built without unicode support > to get some of that speed back? Thank god, no. ASCII is so 1995... However, if you can, please post the code, so that we can run benchmarks ourselves, and figure out what the difference is exactly and whether one can do something about it. 5.8.x fixes quite a few bugs of 5.6, and in somecases these fixes make the code slower (due to more checks/conditions). Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri Oct 14 16:15:11 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "The campaign should combat the messages of pornography by putting signs on buses saying sex with children is not OK." -- Mary Anne Layden in ttp://tinyurl.com/6a9cy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQ0+903cLPEOTuEwVAQFPXwf/RceVIYpZ93gSQHETV1hIBiE9rIj+gFQw 2wGJ/k2Xe+sZPDi61U7qVMETJ5vV3NVBcE/B8D4h0rvGlVr3SY/2y7VufNoD6dVT kX0CAL7rxsDbbqOmezMU6NIJmEMOZ7ak5eRk6jJr2oOxJWm1I5GRE3yOuVu6Eepd tjyau4C4PRsBV4vJXMAvhkgpLP5WFu9dggaYey74V15HkvpdfSz9pB2/B5v/5WFT /uDDx+UtQPtk06LByTTymbhCoM6AnaWTdPRXuuj9gRDXQ7QRO8jNK035DWKxFD+U Wbg1i7DOTbF7mpsMxvQqopMHtm+AyTCpJLuoeY6TE3Rc3nim+nQL9Q== =ZVj4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
