Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Am I doing something wrong? Maybe because of refcounts and such?
Yes, I think so. (But I'm not the expert on these)
---->8 snip 8<----
RETVAL = sv_2mortal(newRV_noinc((SV*)array));
/me .oO( wow, how often do you get to correct Dr. Clark? )
The OUTPUT: apparatus will mortalize RETVAL for you. Here's a snippet
from a generated C file.
RETVAL = newRV_noinc(target);
}
#line 1516 "lib/KinoSearch.c"
ST(0) = RETVAL;
sv_2mortal(ST(0));
}
XSRETURN(1);
So, you shouldn't mortalize RETVAL yourself.
Hmms. that means I should Ctrl+C my test and wait for any other
correction. Or probably the error is somewhere else ;)
Thanks
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
"Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
--- Donald Knuth
