Change 14220 by jhi@alpha on 2002/01/12 18:27:32

        Hrmph.  Is having a test for an exact version of MM_Unix.pm
        really worth the bits it's printed on?

Affected files ...

.... //depot/perl/lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_Unix.t#5 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/perl/lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_Unix.t#5 (text) ====
Index: perl/lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_Unix.t
--- perl/lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_Unix.t.~1~   Sat Jan 12 11:30:06 2002
+++ perl/lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_Unix.t       Sat Jan 12 11:30:06 2002
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
        + ($ExtUtils::MM_Unix::Is_VMS   || 0); 
 ok ( $os <= 1,  'There can be only one (or none)');
 
-is ($ExtUtils::MM_Unix::VERSION, '1.12604', 'Should be that version');
+is ($ExtUtils::MM_Unix::VERSION, '1.12605', 'Should be that version');
 
 # when the following calls like canonpath, catdir etc are replaced by
 # File::Spec calls, the test's become a bit pointless
End of Patch.

Reply via email to