Change 19893 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/06/30 09:46:21
Update Changes.
Affected files ...
... //depot/maint-5.8/perl/Changes#24 edit
... //depot/maint-5.8/perl/patchlevel.h#26 edit
Differences ...
==== //depot/maint-5.8/perl/Changes#24 (text) ====
Index: perl/Changes
--- perl/Changes#23~19857~ Thu Jun 26 01:29:59 2003
+++ perl/Changes Mon Jun 30 02:46:21 2003
@@ -28,6 +28,180 @@
Version v5.8.1 Maintenance release working toward v5.8.1
--------------
____________________________________________________________________________
+[ 19891] By: jhi on 2003/06/30 09:39:29
+ Log: Integrate:
+ [ 19857]
+ Regen Changes.
+
+ [ 19858]
+ perlhack update, by Steve Grazzini
+ about macro support in gdb and gcc.
+
+ [ 19859]
+ Hash/Util.t and Encode/t/Aliases.t seem to be having
+ random failures. To make these easier to reproduce,
+ add a variable, PERL_HASH_SEED_DEBUG, to display the
+ hash seed. E.g. in Debian/x86 Linux 3.0 PERL_HASH_SEED
+ of 82972356 makes the first one to fail.
+
+ [ 19860]
+ Subject: Re: Change 19854: Bite the bullet and apply the hash
randomisation patch.
+ From: Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:53:22 +0100
+ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ [ 19861]
+ Do not obey PERL_HASH_SEED or PERL_HASH_SEED_DEBUG
+ if tainting-- but is this a good thing or a bad thing?
+ (At least it makes debugging lib/Hash/Util.t harder,
+ since it has, for no apparent good reason, -T: one must
+ make a copy of it without the -T.)
+
+ [ 19862]
+ Make doing_taint() always available (though not
+ part of the public API).
+
+ [ 19863]
+ Introduce (global) variable PL_earlytaint which
+ is set very early in main(), before perl_parse()
+ has been called and PL_tainting (or PL_taint_warn)
+ might have been set.
+
+ [ 19864]
+ Use the PL_earlytaint. (PL_earlytaint is a global,
+ not per-interp, since perl_construct() is not passed
+ the argc, argv, and therefore it can't set the per-interp
+ PL_tainting.)
+
+ [ 19865]
+ atoi() doesn't cut the mustard if the PERL_HASH_SEED
+ is larger than INT_MAX (atoi() returns -1 in that case).
+
+ [ 19866]
+ Some warnings about the (im)proper uses of the hash randomisation.
+
+ [ 19867]
+ The two-for-loops is no more a valid way to walk through
+ a hash (this was the reason the Hash/Util.t intermittently
+ failed, the two-loop didn't find all the SVs of the HV).
+
+ [ 19868]
+ Integrate mainline
+
+ [ 19869]
+ Fix test count, by Abe Timmerman.
+
+ [ 19870]
+ Two debugging patches.
+ The first allows to hold symbolic switches in $^D
+ and more generally fixes assignment to $^D. The
+ second one improves the information given by -Dl.
+
+ Subject: [PATCH] allow $^D = "flags"
+ From: Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:26:24 +0100
+ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ Subject: [PATCH] make -Dl show more scope info
+ From: Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:00:36 +0100
+ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ [ 19871]
+ Subject: [Encode] pre-1.97 patches
+ From: Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 01:20:59 +0900
+ Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ [ 19872]
+ Some clarification about the current semantics of CHECK and
+ INIT blocks. See bug [perl #22826].
+
+ [ 19873]
+ Using $1 without testing success of the regexp, bad.
+
+ [ 19874]
+ Retract #19867; the bug was really much simpler:
+ the < max must be <= max instead.
+
+ [ 19875]
+ Duh.
+
+ [ 19876]
+ Subject: Re: your malloc patches
+ From: Ilya Zakharevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:54:06 -0700
+ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ More malloc patches: now they seem to work even in Tru64.
+
+ [ 19877]
+ The #19842 is no more needed thanks to #19876,
+ and the #19842 was wrong anyway (it affected
+ only the threaded case.)
+
+ [ 19878]
+ Move the PL_earlytaint initialization to the PERL_SYS_INIT()
+ as per suggestion from Sarathy.
+
+ [ 19879]
+ Another spot where a zero $test{$max} can make things go boom.
+
+ [ 19880]
+ argc, argv.
+
+ [ 19881]
+ More coffee...
+
+ [ 19882]
+ Perl_doing_taint must be public, for programs that embed perl
+
+ [ 19883]
+ More on the macro debugging and expansion.
+
+ [ 19884]
+ The joy of $0. Undoing the #16399 makes Andreas'
+ tests (see [perl #22811]) pass (yes, padding with space instead
+ of nul makes no sense, but that seems to work, maybe Linux does
+ some deep magic in ps(1)?); moving the PL_origalen computation
+ earlier makes also the threaded-first case fully pass.
+
+ But in general modifying the argv[] is very non-portable.
+ (e.g. in Tru64 it seems to be limited to the size of the
+ original argv[0] since the argv[] are not contiguous?)
+
+ Everybody should just have setproctitle().
+
+ [ 19885]
+ Fix a faulty alias.
+
+ [ 19886]
+ Misc Pod Nits.
+
+ [ 19887]
+ $0 test tweaks from Andreas.
+
+ [ 19888]
+ $0 doc tweakage.
+
+ [ 19889]
+ The 'contiguous' test for argv[], envp[] was bogus
+ since those need not be in memory end-to-end, e.g.
+ in Tru64 they are aligned by eight. Loosen the test
+ so that 'contiguousness' is fulfilled if the elements
+ are within PTRSIZE alignment. This makes Tru64 to pass
+ the join.t, too.
+
+ [ 19890]
+ int is not UV.
+ Branch: maint-5.8/perl
+ !> (integrate 39 files)
+____________________________________________________________________________
+[ 19857] By: jhi on 2003/06/26 08:29:59
+ Log: Regen Changes.
+ Branch: maint-5.8/perl
+ ! Changes
+____________________________________________________________________________
[ 19856] By: jhi on 2003/06/26 05:55:24
Log: Update Changes.
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
==== //depot/maint-5.8/perl/patchlevel.h#26 (text) ====
Index: perl/patchlevel.h
--- perl/patchlevel.h#25~19856~ Wed Jun 25 22:55:24 2003
+++ perl/patchlevel.h Mon Jun 30 02:46:21 2003
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
#if !defined(PERL_PATCHLEVEL_H_IMPLICIT) && !defined(LOCAL_PATCH_COUNT)
static char *local_patches[] = {
NULL
- ,"MAINT19855"
+ ,"MAINT19891"
,NULL
};
End of Patch.
