Change 19932 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/07/02 14:29:42
Subject: Re: maint @ 19923
From: Jim Cromie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 05:35:06 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Affected files ...
... //depot/perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#392 edit
Differences ...
==== //depot/perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#392 (text) ====
Index: perl/pod/perlfunc.pod
--- perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#391~19854~ Wed Jun 25 22:32:02 2003
+++ perl/pod/perlfunc.pod Wed Jul 2 07:29:42 2003
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@
function would produce on the same (unmodified) hash. Since Perl
5.8.1 the ordering is different even between different runs of Perl
because of security reasons (see L<perlsec/"Algorithmic Complexity
-Attacks".)
+Attacks">)
When the hash is entirely read, a null array is returned in list context
(which when assigned produces a false (C<0>) value), and C<undef> in
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@
function produces (given that the hash has not been modified).
Since Perl 5.8.1 the ordering is different even between different
runs of Perl because of security reasons (see L<perlsec/"Algorithmic
-Complexity Attacks".)
+Complexity Attacks">)
As a side effect, calling keys() resets the HASH's internal iterator,
see L</each>.
@@ -6223,7 +6223,7 @@
function would produce on the same (unmodified) hash. Since Perl
5.8.1 the ordering is different even between different runs of Perl
because of security reasons (see L<perlsec/"Algorithmic Complexity
-Attacks".)
+Attacks">)
As a side effect, calling values() resets the HASH's internal iterator,
see L</each>.
End of Patch.
