From: John Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Paul Marquess wrote: > > Does that mean that this is the case? > > > > 1.10 < 1.2 > > > > Depends; are you talking about version objects or the parameters, > also whether > the parameters were quoted: > > version->new(1.10) < version->new(1.2) # 1.100 < 1.200 > version->new("1.10") > version->new("1.2") # 1.010 > 1.002 > > This is actually why I don't like treating the quoted version > different than the > unquoted. However, if Sarathy insists that 1.10 => 1.100 and not > 1.010, there is going to be a discontinuity.
UGH! The term "can of worms" springs to mind. Paul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
