On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:21:07AM +0000, Steve Hay wrote: > Sounds like a good idea to me. Ideally all dual lived modules should be > effectively co-maintained by p5p, otherwise, unless you are willing to > have maint's version differ from the latest CPAN release, then p5p isn't > fully in control of the whole of the Perl distro, which seems to defeat > the point of p5p. > > Could we try to get all the affected authors to agree to this? Some > etiquette could be involved whereby the authors are given a chance to > resolve issues themselves first, and p5p would only step in with their > co-maintainership powers after a certain time has passed if nothing has > happened.
Do you mean something in addition to Porting/Contract? Are there problems which are not covered by that document, or simply problems that are? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
