On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:24:10 +0900 Shinya Hayakawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any objections to use ||= op > instead of writing the following code? > > @ary = (...) unless @ary; > @ary or @ary = (...); > > This means enabling @ary ||= (...); as well as &&=, //=; X ||= Y should be a shortcut for X = X || Y, but currently @foo = qw(a b c); @foo = @foo || qw(d e f); results in that @foo = (3) because '||' op forces a scalar context. So I'm afraid it's not the same as '@ary or @ary = (...)' stuff. -- Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
