On 6/23/05, Elizabeth Mattijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW: I think this nails the coffin on :unique. > > I think the safest would be to deprecate ":unique" by making it a > noop. And be done with it.
Strictly speaking, deprecation and removal are not the same thing. I don't think there's much advanced threaded perl code out there, but you never know. After all, a large number of systems ship a threaded perl by default. > With the current state of parrot / pugs / perl 6 / ponie I don't > think it is worth the tuits to get ":unique" right. Except if it helps ponie.
