On 7/4/05, Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Q. What does noncommercial mean? > >> A. Non-commercial means that you are not getting compensated in any > >> form > >> for the products and/or services you develop using these Intel(r) > >> Software Products > >> > >> I'm not criticising Intel for this. Merely noting that they are very > >> restrictive. For example, one couldn't make a request for TPF development > >> grant and use the compiler. ... > >to have to work under GCC, IANAL but I do not see any problem. Considering > >the > >terms of the FAQ, here's how you could use ICC to help with work > >funded by a grant > >from The Perl Foundation: You do the work using GCC, and testing the > >work to see > >if it builds under ICC, and patching it so it does, is a separate, > >unfunded (and therefore > >allowed) research project. > > But he would have the compensation of "a job well done". > > After all "compensation" only came to mean "money" after catbert-types > started counting other things as well.
I don't think "compensation" is the word to argue about, I think it's "for" and "develop." nobody else can give me personal satisfaction at my skills -- that's silly. -- David L Nicol
