> [nicholas - Sat Feb 28 09:50:01 2004]:
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 05:39:33PM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 05:06:51PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > > Change 22258 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2004/02/01 17:40:02
> > >
> > > This touches quite a few dual life modules maintained outside the
> core, yet
> > > it doesn't seem to tweak any version numbers. I presume that this
> changes
> > > are not yet passed on upstream?
> > >
> > > [I was about to merge it to maint then had second thoughts because
> of this]
> >
> > I applied this patch when I was still in a state of blissful
> ignorance about
> > dual-life modules. Since then I have matured into a state of fearful
> > ignorance.
> > I belive these days one is supposed to bump up the sub-version
> number
> > and notify the maintainers. Would you like me to do this?
>
> I think the combination is what Rafael said should be done. Certainly
> the
> changes need to get to the upstream authors.
>
> Given that I'm trying to get a maint snapshot out this weekend, I'd be
> happy
> not to be the person doing it :-) So if you could, that'd be great.
>
> Nicholas Clark
>
>
Change 22409 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2004/02/28 23:29:10
Bump version numbers of moules affected by change #22258
(removing /tmp and other insecurities)
Done.
