On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:29:48 +0100, Robin Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In an earlier patch of mine (18696), I made a mistake. > [I added code to a one-line if statement > without changing it to a block if.] > The attached patch fixes the mistake and (much harder) > provides a test to distinguish old and new behaviour. Thanks, applied it as posted as change #25137 > Should new tests go at the end of the test file to > preserve test numbers or with related tests? I've > put this test at the end but it really "belongs" > with the other tests of the form >%*2$...< >[12, 3]< New tests go where they make most sense -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using Perl 5.6.2, 5.8.0, 5.8.5, & 5.9.2 on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00 & 11.11, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, SuSE 9.2 & 9.3, and Cygwin. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn Smoking perl: http://www.test-smoke.org, perl QA: http://qa.perl.org reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], perl-qa@perl.org
