Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Removing the auto-newline appending in fresh_perl_is() exposed some newline
> sloppiness in t/run/fresh_perl.t.
> 
> * When switches were stripped from test code a blank line was left.
>   This confused attempts by fresh_perl to display the first line of the
>   program as a default name.
> 
> * Some programs have no expected output, we only care that they don't
>   segfault.  These would warn as the expected output was undef.
> 
> * Tests with no switches generated undef warnings.
> 
> * Separating the test into the program and the expected part stripped
>   the trailing newline off the program causing a test to fail which
>   ended in a here-doc separator.

Thanks, applied as #25239.

Reply via email to