Larry Wall wrote: > > Oh, gee, where's your sense of history? (As in creating our own. :-) > Maybe we should invent our own epoch, like the year 2000. Or use a > really standard one, like the year 0 AD (aka 1 BC). I don't know about this. Sounds cool, but I think we should stick to something that somebody somewhere uses already. Of course, something standard like 0 AD isn't bad. > I have this horror that people will still be using 1970 as the epoch in > the year 31,536. Yeah, but by then we'll be on Perl 203.4.2 and it'll be our children's children's children's children's issue (assuming Perl and computers are still around even). Plus, at least the difference between the UNIX epoch and 31,536 is 1970 less than the difference between 0 AD and 31,536. (For those counting bits.) :-) -Nate
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Tim Jenness