Karl Glazebrook wrote: > Jon Ericson wrote: > > I've spent almost a day trying to come up with a polite response to this > > suggestion. I have started this mail 3 or 4 times but deleted what I > > wrote because it was too sarcastic, angry or dismissive. This RFC > > Thanks! > > > strikes to the very heart of Perl as far as I'm concerned. > > What's wrong with that? There are no rules as to what we are allowed > to discuss. > Well FORTRAN and C are not array languages, and IDL costs N*$1000. Now > there IS Numerical Python if you can put up with indents! > Offensive is a strong word for what is essentially a discussion about > computer lingo syntaces! But this isn't about 'computer lingo syntaces' [sic]. It's about Perl. I think you should consider using Python and a good text editor that takes care of indents for you. There's no more point in discussing this. Jon -- Knowledge is that which remains when what is learned is forgotten. - Mr. King
- RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter