On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:40:18AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > See, I don't see it as that big a deal, especially not if lvalue and > rvalue subs work identically. Hrm. Perhaps you aren't explaining yourself clearly. Let's pretend that there is a magical value called $LVALUE that contains the thing being assigned. Are you saying that in somesub = $value; the subroutine C<somesub>, being lvaluable by default is free to use or ignore $LVALUE? If so, how does one detect errors? When C<somesub> is ignoring $LVALUE the above would silently fail, yes? -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC 107 (v1) lvalue subs should receive the rvalue as ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Make lvalue subs the default (was Re: RFC 107 (v1... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re: RFC... Piers Cawley
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re:... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was... Andy Wardley
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re: RFC... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re:... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the def... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Make lvalue subs the... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re:... James Mastros
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re: RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was Re:... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default... Graham Barr
- Re: Make lvalue subs the default (was... Chaim Frenkel