On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote: > I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. While that might be useful for simple calculations, I expect it would simply get in the way and slow things down for larger, more complex calculations. Alas I don't think there's any shortcut for actual analysis of the underlying data and algorithms. Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Peter Scott
- Re: Do we really need eq? Tom Christiansen
- attributes definable as well as values Re... Andy Dougherty
- attributes definable as well as value... David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Do we really need eq? Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Wiger
- RE: Do we really need eq? Fisher Mark
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski