Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > > David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >"overlay" is reminiscent of old IBM machines swapping parts of the > >program out because there isn't enough core. > > Which is exactly why I chose it - the places these things makes sense are > on little machines where memory is a premium. > > our add-ons are going to be loaded on need > by the parent and only depend on the parent. Oh, and then they will be unloaded if we need the space for something else. I understand now, thanks. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subroutine one-arg, him called no-arg, get $_-arg. Ug.
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Alan Burlison
- RE: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Al Lipscomb
- RE: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... mooring
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from c... Michael Maraist
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski