On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:04:03PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> Suppose a WGC establishes a requirement for the solidity of the
> implementation section, and receives an RFC that does not meet the
> requirements. What then?
>
If the WGC chair sets forth explicit requirements as to what goes
into the implementation section, then any RFC that does not meet
those requirements will be put on hold or rejected for cause and
sent back to the author (with a CC to the WGC).
Currently, any RFCs that do not meet the low formatting requirements
are put on hold or rejected for cause and sent back to the author.
In both cases, an RFC will be accepted when fixed.
Ditto for other requirements. Starting tomorrow, Status: fields will
be manditory, and all new RFCs will default to 'Status: Developing'
if omitted.
Z.
