Bart Lateur wrote: > Personally, I would like to have Larry's fiat *before* trying to iron > out the incompatibilities. It could be that you throw away something > that Larry would approve of, and keep something he doesn't like. I'd vote to go for what we think is the best compromise. If Larry interacts as part of the discussion leading there that's fine. We should have some trust in our own judgement. Christian
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Christian Soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... c . soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Larry Wall
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller