On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:17:47PM -0400, Ken Fox wrote: > > That's fine for the VM and the support libraries, but I'd *really* like > > to see the parser/front-end in Perl. There are dozens of RFCs that require > > some non-trivial extensions to the parser. It would be nice to code these > > in Perl > > Are there any better reasons than "It would be nice?" It'd make things easier? (I'd rather write a parser in perl than C...) I think wedges into the parser/lexer (heck, all of the perl interpreter's pieces) are in order, though we might not want to write the lower-level bits in perl. Dan
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Langua... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Ken Fox
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Ken Fox
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Philip Newton
- No, not A, but A David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl Implementation Language Simon Cozens