Re: RFC 227 (v1) Extend the window to turn on taint mode

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> But these all lack command line switches that are passed to perl.

DS> No, they don't. Not everywhere, certainly. Command-line switches
DS> can be passed to all of 'em. Not everyone counts on the magic
DS> shebang line to find the command interpreter...

If the -T ordering can easily be fixed (e.g. re-execing perl) then
fix it. 

But if it can't, then even your case is solvable by simply adding the
switch to the actual shell invocation. So far nothing seems to be
a major hassle.

My real issue is that the ordering and interactions of the switches
will have to be clearly defined. (The obvious one is handling -S
first and then reading the script.) But then the PATH can't be
changed by a previous -M. And the -M perhaps shouldn't have been
run because the -T should have been honored. Or ...

Hmm, that might not be a bad idea at all. There was some talk about
reworking the command line.

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183