David L. Nicol wrote: > > I am not suggesting dropping the magic signifiers from the beginning of > Perl scalars and containers. In fact, I resent these insinuations > (first Nathan's, now yours) that I am among those who suggest dropping the > decorations from perl scalars. I am not among that group. First off, I am not insinuating any such thing. I made a plain statement of perl-land fact. Truth be told, I did not know who, if anyone, let alone if you, were a member of "drop the decoration" camp. As I said, I was not involved in the thread up to this point. Secondly, if anyone should resent anything, it should be I who resents your responding to -- and quoting -- private email back onto the list. Inexcusable. -- John Porter
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- we already have barewords as variables if we want them Re: ... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords as variables if we want them ... John Porter
- Re: we already have barewords as variables if we want them ... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords as variables if we want them ... David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: the C JIT Sam Tregar
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Ken Fox
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Ken Fox
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Uri Guttman
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: the C JIT John Porter