This seems very complicated. Did you look at the Ram:6 recipe on
expressing AND, OR, and NOT in a regex? For example, to do
/FOO/ && /BAR/ you need not write /FOO.*BAR|BAR.*FOO/ -- and in
fact, should not, as it doesn't work properly on some pairs!
For example, /CAN/ && /ANAL/ can't be written /CAN.*ANAL|ANAL.*CAN/
of you expect to match "CANAL". Overlaps bite you. You really
need /(?=.*CAN)(?=.*ANAL)/ instead, which permits multiple assertions.
Please check out the recipe I'm talking about.
--tom, from a strange place
PS: NB -- I cannot access my mail spool. And the mailing list
archives are 4 days behind on the website, so there is no
hope of me participating in real-time, nor in seeing any
private replies.
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
