Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 07:20:08AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> > RFC 189 covers this.
> 
> So it does! Cool, I can withdraw mine *and* get the warm fuzzy feeling that
> comes from like-thinking-of-great-minds.
> 
> RFC 307 is withdrawn!

I do like the C<PRAYER> special subroutine as a way of sidestepping
the naming arguments that sprang up with RFC 189 though.

-- 
Piers

Reply via email to