Chaim Frenkel writes: > I would like to have an undef returned. Ah, I see. You want subroutines to return undef if they're given it for any of their arguments. That'd break the lazy programmer practice of passing undef expecting it to become "" or 0. They don't have warnings on, of course. Nat
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should return undef on... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should return und... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should return und... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should return... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should re... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index shoul... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and in... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex an... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex an... John Porter
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex an... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should return... John Porter
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index should re... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index shoul... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and index ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex and in... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 213 (v1) rindex an... Glenn Linderman