>POD, presumably. Or maybe son-of-POD; it would be nice to have better >support for tables and lists. We did this for the camel. Which, I remind the world, was written in pod. ''tom
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for do... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML fo... Robin Berjon
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML fo... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML fo... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... John Porter
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Greg Boug
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Nathan Torkington