On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:14:49PM -0500, David Grove wrote:
> [...] I've no idea why Sarathy was deposed,
He wasn't.
> but I have a
> pretty big suspicion.
And a pretty big, well known problem with ActiveState.
> The problem is, I love Sarathy too. He's a hero,
Yes, he's pretty heroic.
> now with
> a tarnished reputation,
You think his reputation is tarnished, because that forwards your
anti-ActiveState beliefs. I daresay that you are the only one with
such a belief, or such reason for that belief.
> not necessarily solely because but definitely partially
> because, of a poor choice in employers.
"Definitely partially"? Logically, if his reputation isn't tarnished,
then he didn't choose employers poorly.
David, please take your conspiracies elsewhere. We've all heard
them before and they are not germane to the Perl6 brainstorming
process we find ourselves in right now.
Z.
