On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 10:43:36AM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote: > No. It was to have Windows support built-in to the standard distribution. I see. I notice that you still haven't told me which part of clause three they actually kept. -- In this talk, I would like to speculate a little, on ... the development of intelligent life. I shall take this to include the human race, even though much of its behaviour throughout history has been pretty stupid... - Stephen Hawking
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Russ Allbery
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- intent of a non-legally bindin... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery