On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:25:44PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > well, I was thinking about this - there really should be an extra switch that > makes this possible, rather than typing 'no strict; no warn;' ie: > > #!/usr/local/bin/perl -q # for quick and dirty. We already have a switch that means "quick and dirty", it's called "-e" -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for su... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope fo... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scop... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scop... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern