Edward Peschko wrote: > And don't dismiss 1 as trivial. I personally have spent hours > tracking down simple bugs that I otherwise would have found > within SECONDS with 'use strict'. Which is why, after going through this twice, I now habitually blow in 'use strict' without a moment's thought. (That's not to say that I don't wish I didn't have to. I *do* wish I didn't have to.) -- John Porter You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Nathan Wiger
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Closures and default... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Closures and default... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Closures and default... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Go to perl6-language-strict please (was Re: Warnings, st... John Porter
- Go to perl6-language-strict please (was Re: Warnings, st... schwern
- Re: Go to perl6-language-strict please (was Re: Warnings... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott