On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 08:32:07PM -0500, Adam Turoff wrote: > > >How should the submission process work? As for the RFC's? > > Sounds good to me. > Any additional constraints on acceptance criteria? There is an *expectation* that people will not file PPDs as PPDs unless they have been agreed upon or authorised. Community pressure can be brought to bear on those calling things PPDs when they aren't. :) -- It's a short step from using alt.binaries.warez.protocol-droids.c3p0 to Palpatine seeing a post along the lines of: "CA|\| NE1 0N Th]5 BB0ARD T3Ll M3 H0w 2 GeT KeWL S]Th P0WeRZ!?!?!?!??!?" The rest is, well, a couple more overly-hyped ILM graphics demos. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] in ASR
- Re: State of PDD 0 Dan Sugalski
- Re: State of PDD 0 Nathan Torkington
- Re: State of PDD 0 Edward Peschko
- Re: State of PDD 0 Dan Sugalski
- Re: State of PDD 0 Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: State of PDD 0 Dan Sugalski
- Re: State of PDD 0 Adam Turoff
- Re: State of PDD 0 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: State of PDD 0 Adam Turoff
- Re: State of PDD 0 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: State of PDD 0 Simon Cozens
- Re: State of PDD 0 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: State of PDD 0 Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: State of PDD 0 Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: State of PDD 0 Peter Scott
- Re: State of PDD 0 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: State of PDD 0 Dan Sugalski
- Re: State of PDD 0 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: State of PDD 0 Nathan Torkington
- Re: State of PDD 0 Dan Sugalski
- Re: State of PDD 0 Edward Peschko