----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Edward Peschko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:51 PM Subject: Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN) > > > ..we're waiting > > > for Larry.. yep <wry smile> I am, basically, just *dying* to see perl6! Ho Hum.......
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN schwern
- RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, stri... Edward Peschko
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process Edward Peschko
- RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, stri... Edward Peschko
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Edward Peschko
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Mike Lacey
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, ... Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (oops) Edward Peschko
- RE: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Paul Marquess
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Edward Peschko
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN Bart Lateur