-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:36:48 -0800, "Hong Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The function in Ada can not have any side effect, i.e. no change to
> globals.
Unless my reading of the Ada 95 standard is wrong, there's nothing
that precludes functions having side effects. The only thing an Ada
function cannot do is having "out" or "in out" parameters, so it
cannot modify its arguments, and even that can be circumvented (as
you can pass "in" access parameters).
/L/e/k/t/u
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOsOiu/4C0a0jUw5YEQKjQwCeP2Aeu6aJsdpP3asvcQDS+dyk2aoAoKS5
2gJ1o0xX1lfa0hXrVff1tPvx
=t4je
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: What can we optimize (was... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was... Uri Guttman
- Re: What can we optimize (was... Dan Sugalski
- RE: What can we optimize (was... David Whipp
- RE: What can we optimize (was... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was... David L. Nicol
- pitching names for the attrib... David L. Nicol
- Re: pitching names for the at... Dan Sugalski
- Re: pitching names for the at... John Porter
- Re: What can we optimize (was... Juanma Barranquero
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schw... Piers Cawley
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Schwartzian transforms James Mastros
- Re: Schwartzian transforms John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian transforms Russ Allbery
- Re: Schwartzian transforms John Porter
- Re: Schwartzian transforms Bart Lateur
