At 05:20 PM 4/16/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:11:41PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > I hereby declare that a package declaration at the front of a file > > > unambiguously indicates you are parsing Perl 5 code. > ^^^^^^^ > > Grand. To play devil's advocate here for a moment, that doesn't mean that > > perl 6 will parse > >*cough* s/parse/interpret/; Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... David Whipp
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Edward Peschko