On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, yary <not....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen <l...@dijkmat.nl> > wrote: > > “with” is completely agnostic about what it is working on. It merely > checks for definedness and sets the topicalizer if so. > > Hmm- what's the benefit of with's defined check? Seems like it makes > "with" break if used with type objects. >
But for that there is "given". I thought the whole point of "with" vs. "given" was the definedness check. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
