Ah nice. Wrapping &shell makes more sense than augmenting Proc anyway. LL
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:22 AM Brian Duggan <bdugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, Brian Duggan wrote:
> > I tried numerous variants with multis and signatures that match the
> > existing signatures, but didn't have any success.
>
> Okay, looks like wrap does what I want:
>
> use module;
>
> &shell.wrap( sub (|args) { say 'bye' } );
> hello;
>
> Brian
>
