That's pretty good. But issues are not closed without tests, unless there's a
good reason not to add a test. No reason was mentioned, therefore reopening
this with “testneeded” tag.
On 2017-07-09 15:49:46, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:57:04 -0700, jn...@jnthn.net wrote:
> > On Fri Oct 14 16:40:27 2016, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > The following code attempts to pipe a large Blob (larger than a
> > > pipe's
> > > buffer size) through an external command.
> > > However, it hangs on the `.in.close` line and never finishes:
> > >
> > > my $proc = run «cat -», :in, :out, :bin;
> > > my $input = ("a" x 1000000).encode;
> > > my $promise = start {
> > > $proc.in.write: $input;
> > > $proc.in.close;
> > > }
> > > say $proc.out.slurp-rest(:close, :bin).bytes;
> > > await $promise;
> > >
> > For now, if using threads, stick with Proc::Async (in the future,
> > we'll probably re-implement Proc/run etc. in terms of Proc::Async).
> >
> > /jnthn
>
> jnthn recently made the above mentioned re-implementation so the code
> shown in the report now works.
>
> Closing issue
