On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > See this...
See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were fallout: <timotimo> raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the commit if there's ecosystem fallout, which you just demonstrated https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-08-17#i_15031866 > Personally, I don't mind rereverting it afterwards for inclusion in > 2017.09 To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise to users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and IMO the 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that promise.
