FWIW the title is very misleading, see this discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-10-16#i_15312269
On 2017-10-16 16:23:05, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > say 1.111111111111111111111 > > Result (2014.01 .. d6a9eda): > 1.11111111111111111604544 > > > The number itself is stored as a Rat so there should be no problem > presenting it in a better way.
