“I don't think we should force all future implementations to add BUILDALL.”
Not sure what this remark is for. Can be rakudo tests. On 2017-10-21 09:12:32, brad wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:18:46 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639 > > > > I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close the > > ticket. > > > > I don't think we should force all future implementations to add > BUILDALL. > Especially since Rakudo didn't need this added to work correctly. > > > On 2017-10-13 04:50:32, elizabeth wrote: > > > > On 13 Oct 2017, at 07:52, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via > > > > RT) > > > > <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > > > > # Please include the string: [perl #132283] > > > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this > > > > issue. > > > > # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132283 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code: > > > > class Foo { has $.bar }; my $f = Foo.new(bar=>'u'); say > > > > $f.^methods; > > > > > > > > ¦«2015.12»: > > > > (bar) > > > > > > > > ¦«2016.06»: > > > > (bar) > > > > > > > > ¦«2016.12»: > > > > (bar) > > > > > > > > ¦«2017.06»: > > > > (bar) > > > > > > > > ¦«f72be0f130cf»: > > > > (bar BUILDALL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bisectable points at two relevant commits: > > > > First it was BUILDALL_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION after > > > > > > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/9837687d93c907ec232b1c7635776aa0c7faa6bc > > > > Now it is BUILDALL after > > > > > > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/63cf246fd4caa43c52a212054a98e9b450c54127 > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if BUILDALL should be listed or not. My gut feeling > > > > says > > > > that it shouldn't be, but feel free to argue otherwise. I'm just > > > > the > > > > messenger. > > > > > > Well, it *is* an auto-generated method that is installed in the > > > namespace. Just like “bar”. So either we should show both, or > > > neither. Or introduce a flag to include/exclude auto-generated > > > methods. But then we would need to mark those methods as auto- > > > generated somehow. > > I think BUILDALL is different than bar for several reasons, > it is all uppercase (which usually means it is special) > it is only an optimization > the programmer didn't use a pragma to add it > the programmer didn't even implicitly declare it > > (I mean that ｢has $.bar｣ as an implicit declaration > of a method of the same name) > > So I think discussing whether this use of BUILDALL needs to be hidden > can be > discussed independently of whether an atribute method needs to be > hidden.
