El dom., 30 sept. 2018 a las 15:54, Fernando Santagata (< nando.santag...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> What I was pointing out is that the '*' operator outputs an error, and I > was expecting that, while the '+' doesn't. > Besides, the '+' delivers the correct result, which apparently indicates > that the two operators are treated differently. > Yep, but I think that the surprising thing is that + behaves that way; [*] behaves just the way it should... > > I was trying to understand whether this behavior is inherent to the Perl 6 > type system or it's just a bug. > Well, it's incoherent. I'm not sure it's a bug. Also, I'm not sure that what you think is a bug is the bug. Cheers JJ
