Hong Zhang wrote:
>
> based scheme itself. For example, an local variable is not used by
> any of the code, however an eval($s) may refer to it. So should optimizer
> eliminate the local?
>
> Hong
mark blocks that have closures in them, in those, you can't throw any
locals out. Otherwise, you can throw them out if youre not going to
use them
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Obi-Wan taught me mysticism" -- Luke Housego
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dave Mitchell
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Hong Zhang
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Hong Zhang
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) David L. Nicol
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) mooring
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) mooring
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) David L. Nicol
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Simon Cozens
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Simon Cozens
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
